Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Korean J Med Educ ; 36(1): 51-63, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462242

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the teaching competencies of medical residents. METHODS: A modified Delphi study was conducted from January to March 2017. Twenty-four panelists (six medical educators, program directors, chief residents, and residents each) from various facilities in Japan participated in the study. The consensus criterion for this study was that more than 80% of the panelists gave a rating of 6 or higher on the 7-point Likert scale ("not at all important" to "extremely important") without any comments. The modified Delphi approach resulted in a list of 27 resident teaching competencies after three rounds. These competencies were categorized based on Harden and Crosby's 12 roles of medical teachers. RESULTS: Our study revealed that, of the 12 roles, residents were primarily viewed as "clinical or practical teachers," "teaching role models," "on-the-job role models," "learning facilitators," and "student assessors." CONCLUSION: The 27 resident teaching competencies indicate the importance of educational proximity for residents as teachers. It is expected that this finding will contribute to competency-based resident-as-teacher education.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Humans , Delphi Technique , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Japan , Teaching
2.
BMC Prim Care ; 24(1): 21, 2023 01 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36653776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the growing global urbanization and urban population have resulted in the emergence of various health problems unique to urban areas. Therefore, training general practitioners and family physicians who can tackle the complex health problems of urban areas and improve the health of urban people is one of the most important issues of our time. However, findings on competencies for urban general practitioners (GP) and family physicians (FP) were limited. This study aimed to identify their comprehensive and content-validated list of competencies. METHODS: We used the modified Delphi method to develop a content-validated competency list. First, we analyzed and synthesized the competencies extracted from the literature review using qualitative thematic analysis methods to create an initial competency list of 34 items. We then assembled 39 expert panelists in four groups of study participants: physicians, nurses, patients, and medical education specialists. The expert panelists were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the lists and provide revised comments on the description of each competency via a web-based questionnaire. Their responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by the research team and used to revise the list. These processes were repeated, and the survey was completed when it was determined that consensus had been reached. RESULTS: Three rounds of Delphi were conducted. 39 responded in the first round, 38 in the second round, and 36 in the third round. The initial list of competencies was revised and consolidated from 34 to 14 items in the first round, bringing the total to 20 items along with six new items proposed by the panelists. In the second round, it was revised and consolidated into a list of 18 items. In the third round, all 18 items were considered to have been agreed upon by the panelists, so the survey was closed. CONCLUSION: We identified a comprehensive 18-item list of competencies for urban GP/FP in a content-validated manner. Several are newly discovered competencies in this study. The findings of this study will be useful for the future training of urban GP/FP and for solving urban health problems.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Physicians, Family , Humans , Clinical Competence , Delphi Technique , Curriculum
3.
Int J Med Educ ; 13: 274-286, 2022 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36327444

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To examine the related factors associated with medical students' attitudes toward team collaboration. Methods: This cross-sectional study targeted medical students, residents, and doctors. A survey was conducted from 2016 to 2017 using the Japanese version of the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Collaboration (JeffSATIC-J), which evaluated "working relationship" and "accountability." We analyzed 2409 questionnaire responses with JeffSATIC-J items and the gender item. Analysis of variance was used for factors associated with the JeffSATIC-J score and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the relationship between educational intervention and the JeffSATIC-J score. Results: First-year students' scores were the highest (F(2, 2045) = 13.42 to 18.87, p < .001), and female students' scores were significantly higher than those of male students (F(1, 2045) = 21.16 to 31.10, p < .001). For residents' scores, the institution was not a significant variable. Female "accountability" scores were significantly higher than those of males (F (1,108) = 4.95, p = .03). Gender was not a significant variable for doctors' scores. Sixth-year students' scores were significantly correlated with the length of clinical clerkship (r(5)=.78 to .96, p<.05), with the exception of females' "working relationship" scores. The medical school with the highest JeffSATIC-J scores had the longest clinical clerkship in the community. Conclusions: These results indicate that long-term clinical clerkship in the community at higher grades is important in improving medical students' attitudes toward team collaboration. A qualitative study is required to confirm our findings.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Students, Medical , Male , Female , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Attitude , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Tokai J Exp Clin Med ; 47(4): 154-161, 2022 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36420545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop versatile and interactive model classes by generating the contents of Kampo classroom sessions that can be taught by instructors who are not familiar with Kampo medicine. METHODS: In 2018, we conducted Kampo classroom sessions among fourth-year medical students at Kyushu University in which we incorporated new content. A videotaped digest edition of the classes was sent to Kampo medicine instructors in medical schools throughout Japan. An online questionnaire was given to the instructors regarding effectiveness of the class content (Q1) and whether they would introduce the content in their classes (Q2). We modified the curriculum according to survey responses and conducted revised classroom sessions again in 2019. A second online survey was given and we finalized the model classes. We compared survey responses between staff and instructors (group A) and non-specialists in Kampo medicine (group B). RESULTS: In 2018, there were significant differences between groups A (44) and B (52) regarding a patient's story and case report (Q1). In 2019, there were significant differences between groups A (42) and B (54) regarding the case report using e-learning(Q1) and an instructor's experience (Q2). CONCLUSIONS: We propose that Kampo medicine classes should incorporate an instructor's experience and interactive case report presentation using e-learning.


Subject(s)
Medicine, Kampo , Students, Medical , Humans , Curriculum , Schools, Medical , Learning
5.
Intern Med ; 61(16): 2431-2440, 2022 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35676035

ABSTRACT

Objective This cross-sectional national study determined which educational approaches are associated with the effectiveness of online clerkship for medical students. Method A survey was conducted for medical students at 78 medical schools in Japan from May 29 to June 14, 2020. It comprised the following aspects: (a) participants' profiles, (b) number of opportunities to learn from each educational approach (lecture, medical quiz, assignment, oral presentation, observation of a physician's practice, clinical skill practice, participation in interprofessional meetings, and interactive discussions with physicians) in online clerkship, (c) frequency of technical problems, and (d) educational outcome measurement (satisfaction, motivation, knowledge acquisition, skill acquisition, change in self-study time, and understanding of the importance of medical care team). Results Of the 2,640 respondents, 2,594 (98.3%) agreed to cooperate. Ultimately, 1,711 matched our inclusion criteria. All educational approaches but assignments were positively associated with satisfaction and motivation. All educational approaches excluding assignment submission and interprofessional meeting were positively associated with knowledge acquisition. Observation, practice, and interprofessional meeting were positively associated with skill acquisition. Only assignment submission was positively associated with the change in self-study time. Educational approaches excluding medical quizzes were positively associated with understanding the importance of the medical care team. Technical problems were negatively associated with motivation, knowledge acquisition, and skill acquisition. Conclusions Educators should implement various educational approaches, especially observation and practice, even in online clinical clerkship. They also need to minimize the technical problems associated with the Internet, as they reduce the effectiveness of online clerkship.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Clerkship , Students, Medical , Clinical Clerkship/methods , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pandemics
6.
Int J Med Educ ; 13: 115-123, 2022 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35510778

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study aimed to determine qualitatively how medical residents develop intrinsic motivation to learn and work in clinical training settings. Methods: This study was a descriptive qualitative study, which is widely used in healthcare research. We conducted a semi-structured interview aimed to explore key participants' in-depth experiences and perspectives regarding intrinsic motivation. The authors interviewed seven postgraduate Japanese medical residents. The transcripts were analyzed using the sequential and thematic qualitative data analysis technique steps for coding and theorization, which entails coding steps from open to selective, writing a storyline using the final selective codes, and offering theories. Results: External stimulations (a self-handle environment and a near-peer role model) triggered the medical residents' cognitive process (gap recognition, awareness, and internalization) to intrinsic motivation. The residents' awareness of autonomy, responsibility, and independence played a vital role in this process. Furthermore, a psychological feeling of competence also reinforced their intrinsic motivation. Positive feedback and approval from attending physicians and patients' gratitude promoted residents' sense of competence. Conclusions: We illustrated a process for increasing medical residents' intrinsic motivation. The intrinsic motivation was triggered by external stimulations (a self-handle environment and a near-peer role model), which caused the cognitive process: gap recognition, awareness of important attitudes as a doctor (autonomy, responsibility, and independence), and internalization. Since the first step of this process was an external factor, there are potential benefits of designing an appropriate training environment for increasing medical residents' intrinsic motivation.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Physicians , Feedback , Humans , Motivation , Qualitative Research
7.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 17: e78, 2022 02 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35129102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Based on experiences following the Great East Japan Earthquake and nuclear power plant accident in 2011, Nuclear Emergency Core Hospitals (NECHs) were designated as centers for radiation disaster management in Japan. This study aimed to investigate their current status and identify areas for improvement. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2018. Demographic data were collected by a questionnaire with free text responses about attitudes toward NECHs. Considerations regarding risk communications during a radiation disaster were analyzed using qualitative text mining analysis. RESULTS: A total of 36 hospitals participated in this study. Only 31% of NECHs anticipated a radiation disaster. The importance of business continuity plans and risk communications was shown. Text analysis identified 7 important categories for health care workers during a radiation disaster, including media response, communications to hospital staff, risk communications, radiation effects on children, planning for a radiation disaster in the region, rumors, and the role in the region. CONCLUSION: The radiation disaster medical system and NECHs in Japan were surveyed. The importance of risk communications, planning for a radiation disaster in each region, and the role in the region are identified as issues that need to be addressed.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Child , Humans , Japan , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Surveys and Questionnaires , Nuclear Power Plants
8.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0263182, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085367

ABSTRACT

Given scientific and technological advancements, expectations of online medical education are increasing. However, there is no way to predict the effectiveness of online clinical clerkship curricula. To develop a prediction model, we conducted cross-sectional national surveys in Japan. Social media surveys were conducted among medical students in Japan during the periods May-June 2020 and February-March 2021. We used the former for the derivation dataset and the latter for the validation dataset. We asked students questions in three areas: 1) opportunities to learn from each educational approach (lectures, medical quizzes, assignments, oral presentations, observation of physicians' practice, clinical skills practice, participation in interprofessional meetings, and interactive discussions with physicians) in online clinical clerkships compared to face-to-face, 2) frequency of technical problems on online platforms, and 3) satisfaction and motivation as outcome measurements. We developed a scoring system based on a multivariate prediction model for satisfaction and motivation in a cross-sectional study of 1,671 medical students during the period May-June 2020. We externally validated this scoring with a cross-sectional study of 106 medical students during February-March 2021 and assessed its predictive performance. The final prediction models in the derivation dataset included eight variables (frequency of lectures, medical quizzes, oral presentations, observation of physicians' practice, clinical skills practice, participation in interprofessional meetings, interactive discussions with physicians, and technical problems). We applied the prediction models created using the derivation dataset to a validation dataset. The prediction performance values, based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were 0.69 for satisfaction (sensitivity, 0.50; specificity, 0.89) and 0.75 for motivation (sensitivity, 0.71; specificity, 0.85). We developed a prediction model for the effectiveness of the online clinical clerkship curriculum, based on students' satisfaction and motivation. Our model will accurately predict and improve the online clinical clerkship curriculum effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship/methods , Curriculum , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Medical/methods , Models, Statistical , Motivation , Personal Satisfaction , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Accuracy , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Research Design , Sensitivity and Specificity , Students, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
BMJ Open ; 11(8): e047602, 2021 08 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34408039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Traditionally, evaluation is considered a measurement process that can be performed independently of the cultural context. However, more recently the importance of considering raters' sense-making, that is, the process by which raters assign meaning to their collective experiences, is being recognised. Thus far, the majority of the discussion on this topic has originated from Western perspectives. Little is known about the potential influence of an Asian culture on raters' sense-making. This study explored residents' sense-making associated with evaluating their clinical teachers within an Asian setting to better understand contextual dependency of validity. DESIGN: A qualitative study using constructivist grounded theory. SETTING: The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has implemented a system to monitor the quality of clinical teaching within its 2-year postgraduate training programme. An evaluation instrument was developed specifically for the Japanese setting through which residents can evaluate their clinical teachers. PARTICIPANTS: 30 residents from 10 Japanese teaching hospitals with experience in evaluating their clinical teachers were sampled purposively and theoretically. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semistructured individual interviews. Sensitising concepts derived from Confucianism and principles of response process informed open, axial and selective coding. RESULTS: Two themes and four subthemes were constructed. Japanese residents emphasised the awareness of their relationship with their clinical teachers (1). This awareness was fuelled by their sense of hierarchy (1a) and being part of the collective society (1b). Residents described how the meaning of evaluation (2) was coloured by their perceived role as senior (2a) and their experienced responsibility for future generations (2b). CONCLUSIONS: Japanese residents' sense-making while evaluating their clinical teachers appears to be situated and affected by Japanese cultural values. These findings contribute to a better understanding of a culture's influence on residents' sense-making of evaluation instruments and the validity argument of evaluation.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Grounded Theory , Humans , Japan , Qualitative Research
10.
Korean J Med Educ ; 33(2): 97-106, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062641

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although many studies have assessed the impact of interventions to increase medical students' empathy by improving their understanding of patients' perspectives and feelings, the impact of hospitalization experiences remains unclear. METHODS: Fifth-year medical students at Kyushu University from 2009-2013 participated in a 2-day/1-night course to provide a hospitalization experience. After the course, participants answered an online, anonymous, open-ended questionnaire created by the authors. RESULTS: Of 488 participants, 462 provided responses (95% response rate), which were evaluated by thematic analysis. Students understood inpatients not only through their own hospitalization experience, but also through observations of and conversations with the inpatients they encountered, from a shared perspective of both. Students experienced the realities of hospital life, stress and psychological states of being an inpatient, and psychological pressure from physicians. In addition, students observed the distress of other inpatients and dedication of medical staff. Furthermore, through communication with these inpatients, students understood other inpatients' anxiety about illness and empathy as one of the requirements of health care providers from the patients' perspective. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study investigated the effectiveness of a course on the hospitalization experience. Results showed that medical students understood the perspectives, distress, and anxiety of being an inpatient, not only from their own experiences but also from observation and communication with other inpatients they encountered during their hospitalization. This experience appeared to be an effective teaching strategy for enhancing medical students' empathy by improving their understanding of patients' perspectives and feelings.


Subject(s)
Students, Medical , Communication , Empathy , Hospitalization , Humans , Immersion
11.
BMC Med Educ ; 21(1): 234, 2021 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33892708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contrastive learning is known to be effective in teaching medical students how to generate diagnostic hypotheses in clinical reasoning. However, there is no international consensus on lists of diagnostic considerations across different medical disciplines regarding the common signs and symptoms that should be learned as part of the undergraduate medical curriculum. In Japan, the national model core curriculum for undergraduate medical education was revised in 2016, and lists of potential diagnoses for 37 common signs, symptoms, and pathophysiology were introduced into the curriculum. This study aimed to validate the list of items based on expert consensus. METHODS: The authors used a modified Delphi method to develop consensus among a panel of 23 expert physician-teachers in clinical reasoning from across Japan. The panel evaluated the items on a 5-point Likert scale, based on whether a disease should be hypothesized by final-year medical students considering given signs, symptoms, or pathophysiology. They also added other diseases that should be hypothesized. A positive consensus was defined as both a 75% rate of panel agreement and a mean of 4 or higher with a standard deviation of less than 1 on the 5-point scale. The study was conducted between September 2017 and March 2018. RESULTS: This modified Delphi study identified 275 basic and 67 essential other than basic items corresponding to the potential diagnoses for 37 common signs, symptoms, and pathophysiology that Japanese medical students should master before graduation. CONCLUSIONS: The lists developed in the study can be useful for teaching and learning how to generate initial hypotheses by encouraging students' contrastive learning. Although they were focused on the Japanese educational context, the lists and process of validation are generalizable to other countries for building national consensus on the content of medical education curricula.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Delphi Technique , Humans , Japan
12.
Front Immunol ; 12: 654623, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33815416

ABSTRACT

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a prototypical autoantibody-driven autoimmune disease in which T-B interactions play a critical role. Recent comprehensive analysis suggests that PD-1+CD8+ T cells as well as two distinct IL-21-producing PD-1+CD4+ T cell subsets, follicular helper T (Tfh) and peripheral helper T (Tph) cells, are involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Herein, we aimed to clarify a generation mechanism of IL-21-producing CD8+ T cells in humans, and to characterize this novel subset in patients with RA. Methods: CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of healthy control (HC) and patients with RA were subject to the analysis of IL-21 mRNA and protein. We evaluated the surface marker, cytokine and transcription profiles of IL-21-producing CD8+ T cells in HCPB, RAPB and RASF. Results: IL-21-producing CD8+ T cells were enriched in the CD45RA-(memory) PD-1+, especially PD-1hi subpopulation, and IL-12 and IL-21 synergistically induced IL-21 production by naïve CD8+ T cells. Memory PD-1hiCD8+ T cells in HCPB facilitated plasmablast differentiation and IgG production in an IL-21-dependent manner. In addition, PD-1hiCD8+ T cells in RASF and RAPB produced large amounts of IL-21 and were characterized by high levels of CD28, ICOS, CD69, HLA-DR, and CCR2 but not CXCR5. Furthermore, PD-1hiCD8+ T cells expressed high levels of transcripts of MAF and PRDM1, a feature observed in Tph cells. Conclusions: Identification of IL-21-producing PD-1hiCD8+ T cells expands our knowledge of T cell subsets with B helper functions in RA. Selective targeting of these subsets could pave an avenue for the development of novel treatment strategies for this disease.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/etiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/metabolism , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Interleukins/biosynthesis , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/metabolism , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , B-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , B-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolism , Biomarkers , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Cell Communication , Cytokines/metabolism , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Immunologic Memory , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolism
13.
Cell Immunol ; 360: 104263, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33387686

ABSTRACT

Efficacy of B-cell depletion therapy highlights the antibody-independent effector functions of B cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Given type 1 helper T (Th1) cells abundant in synovial fluid (SF) of RA, we have determined whether Th1 cells could generate novel effector B cells. Microarray and qPCR analysis identified CXCL9/10 transcripts as highly expressed genes upon BCR/CD40/IFN-γ stimulation. Activated Th1 cells promoted the generation of CXCL9/10-producing T-bet+ B cells. Expression of CXCL9/10 was most pronounced in CXCR3+ switched memory B cells. Compared with peripheral blood, SFRA enriched highly activated Th1 cells that coexisted with abundant CXCL9/10-producing T-bet+ B cells. Intriguingly, anti-IFN-γ antibody and JAK inhibitors significantly abrogated the generation of CXCL9/10-producing T-bet+ B cells. B cell derived CXCL9/10 significantly facilitated the migration of CD4+ T cells. These findings suggest that Th1 cells generate the novel CXCL9/10-producing T-bet+ effector B cells that could be an ideal pathogenic B cell target for RA therapy.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , B-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , B-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolism , Chemokine CXCL10/immunology , Chemokine CXCL10/metabolism , Chemokine CXCL9/immunology , Chemokine CXCL9/metabolism , Chemokine CXCL9/physiology , Female , Gene Expression , Humans , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Lymphocyte Activation , Male , Middle Aged , Th1 Cells/metabolism
14.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(1): 177, 2020 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In health professions education, several collaborative learning approaches have been used. As collaborative learning has a theoretical background of social interdependence theory, a theory informed and valid instrument to measure social interdependence is required to evaluate and compare several learning approaches. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument (the SOcial interdependence in Collaborative learning Scale; SOCS) to measure students' perceived social interdependence in collaborative learning and validate it. METHODS: We conducted a modified Delphi procedure among stakeholders to develop the content validity of the instrument. To establish construct validity, we performed a confirmatory factor analysis, and we estimated reliability. RESULTS: Two rounds of Delphi were conducted to develop the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a three-factor model with 15 items, which provided an excellent fit with CMIN/df = 1.838, GFI = 0.924, CFI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.061, and PCLOSE = 0.121. Alpha-coefficients for all factors indicated high internal consistency of all the factors. CONCLUSION: This study describes the development and construct validation of the SOCS for measuring social interdependence in collaborative learning. This instrument will provide teachers and schools with feedback about their classroom environment.


Subject(s)
Group Processes , Interdisciplinary Placement , Interpersonal Relations , Social Behavior , Students, Health Occupations , Students, Medical , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 248(4): 253-260, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31434837

ABSTRACT

In contrast to input evaluation (education delivered at school) and output evaluation (students' capability at graduation), the methods of outcome evaluation (performance after graduation) of medical education have not been sufficiently established. To establish a method to measure the quality of patient care and conduct outcome evaluation, we have been developing a peer review system of medical records. Here, we undertook a pilot study to evaluate the criterion validity of our system by using "evaluation by program directors (supervisors in the hospitals)" as a criterion standard. We selected 13 senior residents from three teaching hospitals. Five reviewers (general internists working in other hospitals) visited the hospitals independently and evaluated five patients' records for each resident based on the previously established sheet comprising 15 items. Independently, program directors of the senior residents evaluated their clinical performance using an evaluation sheet comprising ten items. Pearson's analysis revealed statistically significant correlation coefficients in three pairs of assessments including clinical reasoning (r = 0.5848, P = 0.0358). Bootstrap analysis revealed statistically significant correlation coefficients in additional 5 pairs including history taking (r = 0.509, 95% confidence interval: 0.034-0.847). In contrast, the correlation coefficients were low in some items: r = 0.132 (-0.393-0.639) for physical examination and r = 0.089 (-0.847-0.472) for attitude toward patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study, albeit a pilot one, that investigates the criterion validity of medical record evaluations conducted by comparing the assessments of medical records with those by program directors.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Internship and Residency , Medical Records , Peer Review , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
17.
BMJ Open ; 8(4): e020082, 2018 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29666132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To clarify competencies for inclusion in our curriculum that focuses on developing leaders in community medicine. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: All six regions of Japan, including urban and rural areas. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen doctors (male: 18, female: 1) who play an important leadership role in their communities participated in semistructured interviews (mean age 48.3 years, range 34-59; mean years of clinical experience 23.1 years, range 9-31). METHOD: Semistructured interviews were held and transcripts were independently analysed and coded by the first two authors. The third and fourth authors discussed and agreed or disagreed with the results to give a consensus agreement. Doctors were recruited by maximum variation sampling until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Six themes emerged: (1)'Medical ability': includes psychological issues and difficult cases in addition to basic medical problems. High medical ability gives confidence to other medical professionals. (2)'Long term perspective': the ability to develop a long-term, comprehensive vision and to continuously work to achieve the vision. Cultivation of future generations of doctors is included. (3) 'Team building':the ability to drive forward programmes that include residents and local government workers, to elucidate a vision, to communicate and to accept other medical professionals. (4)'Ability to negotiate': the ability to negotiate with others to ensure that programmes and visions progress smoothly (5) 'Management ability': the ability to run a clinic, medical unit or medical association. (6) 'Enjoying oneself': doctors need to feel an attraction to community medicine, that it be fun and challenging for them. CONCLUSIONS: We found six competencies that are needed by leaders in the field of community medicine. The results of this study will contribute to designing a curriculum that develops such leaders.


Subject(s)
Community Medicine , Leadership , Physicians , Professional Competence , Adult , Community Medicine/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
18.
Med Teach ; 39(8): 844-850, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28509610

ABSTRACT

AIM: Many instruments for evaluating clinical teaching have been developed, albeit most in Western countries. This study aims to develop a validated cultural and local context sensitive instrument for clinical teachers in an East Asian setting (Japan), Japanese Clinical Teacher Evaluation Sheet (JaCTES). METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional evaluation study was conducted. We collected a total of 1368 questionnaires on 304 clinical teachers, completed by residents in 16 teaching hospitals. The construct validity was examined by conducting a factor analysis and using structural equation modeling (SEM). We also assessed the reliability using generalizability analysis and decision study. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three-factor (role model, teaching activities, and accessibility) model including 18 items. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed, using SEM. The comparative fit index was 0.931 and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.087, meaning an acceptable goodness of fit for this model. To obtain a reliable dependability-coefficient of at least 0.70 or higher, 5-8 resident responses are necessary. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: JaCTES is the first reported instrument with validity evidence of content and internal structure and high feasibility in Japan, an East Asian setting. Medical educators should be aware of the local context and cultural aspects in evaluating clinical teachers.


Subject(s)
Cultural Competency , Cultural Diversity , Faculty, Medical/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Japan , Reproducibility of Results
19.
BMC Med Educ ; 16(1): 245, 2016 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27658501

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Progress testing (PT) is used in Western countries to evaluate students' level of functional knowledge, and to enhance meaning-oriented and self-directed learning. However, the use of PT has not been investigated in East Asia, where reproduction-oriented and teacher-centered learning styles prevail. Here, we explored the applicability of PT by focusing on student perceptions. METHODS: Twenty-four students from Years 2, 3, and 5 at Jichi Medical University in Japan attended a pilot PT session preceded by a brief introduction of its concept and procedures. Variations in obtained test scores were analyzed by year, and student perceptions of PT were explored using focus groups. RESULTS: Formula scores (mean ± standard deviation) in Years 2, 3, and 5 were 12.63 ± 3.53, 35.88 ± 14.53, and 71.00 ± 18.31, respectively. Qualitative descriptive analysis of focus group data showed that students disfavored testing of medical knowledge without tangible goals, but instead favored repetitive assessment of knowledge that had been learned and was tested on a unit basis in the past in order to achieve deep learning. Further, students of all school years considered that post-test explanatory lectures by teachers were necessary. CONCLUSIONS: East Asian students' perceptions indicated that, in addition to their intensive memorization within narrow test domains compartmentalized by end-of-unit tests, the concept of PT was suitable for repetitive memorization, as it helped them to integrate their knowledge and to increase their understanding. Post-test explanatory lectures might lessen their dislike of the intangible goals of PT, but at the expense of delaying the development of self-directed learning. Key issues for the optimization of PT in East Asia may include administration of PT after completed end-of-unit tests and a gradual change in feedback methodology over school years from test-oriented post-test lectures to the provision of literature references only, as a means of enhancing test self-review and self-directed learning.

20.
Med Teach ; 38(4): 395-403, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26089107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Students in clerkship are expected to gain clinical expertise by interacting with real patients in clinical situations. Monitoring and predicting the students' encounter diseases (EDs) is important for providing an optimal experience. EDs should be compared with the available diseases (ADs) at the clerkship site and with the required diseases described in some guidelines for the clinical curriculum. AIMS: To explore the differences in ADs as learning resources among different types of clerkship sites and to investigate discrepancies between EDs and ADs. METHOD: A retrospective observational study used secondary data from government statistics to compare ADs of various types of observable clerkship sites by biplot analyses, which allowed multivariate comparisons. EDs collected from logbooks during clerkships at a university hospital were also compared with ADs across sites. RESULTS: The distributions of ADs differed according to institutional type, and EDs at Kyushu University Hospital were similar to the ADs for the category of hospitals in which it was placed. CONCLUSION: EDs at a clerkship site may be predictable to some extent by analysing the site's distribution of ADs, but further study is needed. Biplot is useful for visualising these types of statistical similarity.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship/standards , Clinical Competence , Students, Medical , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Female , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...